Total:
3
cases
To help creators work faster,
this is a place to share feature ideas and usability issues, and see how they’re improved.
In “Re:MONJI,” the “Re:” reflects our commitment to creators—connection, trust, new perspectives, continuous improvement, and making MONJI+ better.
We welcome all feedback, no matter how small.
If you have any other questions or have noticed any bugs in MONJI+, please contact us.
It would be useful if other MONJI users could make edits to your revision request.
When I share revision requests within my company, other members of my team often suggest more notes that they would like me to add to the request.
Rather than allowing just anyone to edit the request, it would be nice if you could add people as editors through their email address.
It would be very helpful if multiple people could edit the same revision request. (Similar to Google Spreadsheets)
Thank you for your consideration.
When a site has a header that is fixed to the top of the window, this header gets displayed in the middle of the screenshot, and overlaps other things on the page.
It seems like this happens to elements that are set to “position:sticky;”
Thank you for providing us with this free proofing software.
There are a few changes I would like to suggest to improve MONJI.
■ Password protection
It would be useful to be able to password protect revision requests when sending them as a URL.
■ Shrink wide images to fit within the window
I see that many other users are asking for a feature to allow them to expand or shrink the size of the revision request image. (It sounds like that might be difficult to implement…)
When working on horizontal graphic designs that will be printed, it’s difficult to navigate with the horizontal scrollbar. For the time being, it seems like it would be a huge improvement to the UX if wide images were automatically resized to fit within the window.
■ Compatibility with sites that require login
I would be extremely grateful if MONJI had the ability to review pages that require users to login (not just pages protected by basic authentication). This also sounds like it might be difficult to implement though…
Thank you for considering these suggestions.